<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for When This Is, That Is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis</link>
	<description>A householder's thoughts along the Middle Way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Investigating Rebirth by star</title>
		<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2012/01/06/investigating-rebirth/comment-page-1/#comment-1717</link>
		<dc:creator>star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/?p=2964#comment-1717</guid>
		<description>Simon, when you said, &quot;I’d add to what you said that another reason to speculate on *my* future rebirths, not to mention to be attached to them, is to put some insulation between me and mortality&quot; were you saying that there is a danger in speculating because of the attachment to life and detachment from mortality? Or were you suggesting it is a useful skill?

In MN 117 the Buddha describes views that are associated with karma and its results as &quot;tainted views&quot; and says that they result in acquisitions (I trust Bhikkhu Bodhi&#039;s reading of this as &quot;another round of the 5 aggregates in the future&quot;). It seems fairly obvious, after a little putting this path into practice, that concerning ourselves with what we will be in the future is a hindrance because it causes us to cling to and try to understand things about how things will be for (some aspect of) us in the future (whether that aspect is a soul, a self, or something unnameable is moot, it is still in some sense myself I am worrying about).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, when you said, &#8220;I’d add to what you said that another reason to speculate on *my* future rebirths, not to mention to be attached to them, is to put some insulation between me and mortality&#8221; were you saying that there is a danger in speculating because of the attachment to life and detachment from mortality? Or were you suggesting it is a useful skill?</p>
<p>In MN 117 the Buddha describes views that are associated with karma and its results as &#8220;tainted views&#8221; and says that they result in acquisitions (I trust Bhikkhu Bodhi&#8217;s reading of this as &#8220;another round of the 5 aggregates in the future&#8221;). It seems fairly obvious, after a little putting this path into practice, that concerning ourselves with what we will be in the future is a hindrance because it causes us to cling to and try to understand things about how things will be for (some aspect of) us in the future (whether that aspect is a soul, a self, or something unnameable is moot, it is still in some sense myself I am worrying about).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Investigating Rebirth by Paul</title>
		<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2012/01/06/investigating-rebirth/comment-page-1/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/?p=2964#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>When I asked &quot;is it necessary to know?&quot; I see now the question could have two interpretations. Is it necessary to know &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; there is rebirth as opposed to is it necessary to know &lt;em&gt;what&lt;/em&gt; that rebirth is? I go with the former question. In this &lt;a href=&quot;http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2010/05/21/refelections-on-rebirth-reincarnation-and-belief/&quot; title=&quot;Reincarnation&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; I liken rebirth to DNA. Do you believe in DNA? Of course it&#039;s a rhetorical question. DNA and its movement through lifetimes happens whether one believes in it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I asked &#8220;is it necessary to know?&#8221; I see now the question could have two interpretations. Is it necessary to know <em>that</em> there is rebirth as opposed to is it necessary to know <em>what</em> that rebirth is? I go with the former question. In this <a href="http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2010/05/21/refelections-on-rebirth-reincarnation-and-belief/" title="Reincarnation" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">post</a> I liken rebirth to DNA. Do you believe in DNA? Of course it&#8217;s a rhetorical question. DNA and its movement through lifetimes happens whether one believes in it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Investigating Rebirth by Simon</title>
		<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2012/01/06/investigating-rebirth/comment-page-1/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/?p=2964#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul. Thanks for the cogent response. I&#039;d add to what you said that another reason to speculate on *my* future rebirths, not to mention to be attached to them, is to put some insulation between me and mortality.

  You asked &quot;is it necessary to know?&quot; Exactly: what decisions will we make differently? How will we treat others differently if or if not there are future lifetimes? If we will treat people differently, where is right action, either way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul. Thanks for the cogent response. I&#8217;d add to what you said that another reason to speculate on *my* future rebirths, not to mention to be attached to them, is to put some insulation between me and mortality.</p>
<p>  You asked &#8220;is it necessary to know?&#8221; Exactly: what decisions will we make differently? How will we treat others differently if or if not there are future lifetimes? If we will treat people differently, where is right action, either way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Investigating Rebirth by Paul</title>
		<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2012/01/06/investigating-rebirth/comment-page-1/#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/?p=2964#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>Simon, I agree. Superficiality is not reality. I think much of karma plays out in the mind long before events come into the world. Speculating on how things may play out in the future is a vain exercise—like speculating who will win an election. Someone will win, someone will lose. That&#039;s a fact. But the only reason to speculate is to boost one&#039;s ego if one is right. I still wonder, though, about future lifetimes, what it really means. On the other hand, is it really necessary to know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, I agree. Superficiality is not reality. I think much of karma plays out in the mind long before events come into the world. Speculating on how things may play out in the future is a vain exercise—like speculating who will win an election. Someone will win, someone will lose. That&#8217;s a fact. But the only reason to speculate is to boost one&#8217;s ego if one is right. I still wonder, though, about future lifetimes, what it really means. On the other hand, is it really necessary to know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Investigating Rebirth by Simon</title>
		<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2012/01/06/investigating-rebirth/comment-page-1/#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/?p=2964#comment-1713</guid>
		<description>In looking at karma and its results, I&#039;m wondering if we westerners, in our almost exclusive orientation to externalities, are mistaken in interpreting &quot;karmic results&quot; as &quot;results in the world&quot;. As you mention, much of Buddhism is about &quot;things deep in the mind&quot; and sometimes not so deep. It seems to me that acting from bad intention will always have unhealthy effects in the actors mind and spirit. It may not be necessary to speculate on how these actions play out in the world across lives as the karmic accountant balances the books.

 It seems likely to me, looking at myself and others, that the books balance at the act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In looking at karma and its results, I&#8217;m wondering if we westerners, in our almost exclusive orientation to externalities, are mistaken in interpreting &#8220;karmic results&#8221; as &#8220;results in the world&#8221;. As you mention, much of Buddhism is about &#8220;things deep in the mind&#8221; and sometimes not so deep. It seems to me that acting from bad intention will always have unhealthy effects in the actors mind and spirit. It may not be necessary to speculate on how these actions play out in the world across lives as the karmic accountant balances the books.</p>
<p> It seems likely to me, looking at myself and others, that the books balance at the act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Preferences as Objects of Meditation by Paul</title>
		<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2011/05/15/preferences-as-objects-of-meditation/comment-page-1/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/?p=2860#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>Hi Salinya. Thanks for the comment. I agree, being mindful helps as avoid regret. And regret all by itself is a big source of dukkha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Salinya. Thanks for the comment. I agree, being mindful helps as avoid regret. And regret all by itself is a big source of dukkha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Preferences as Objects of Meditation by Salinya</title>
		<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2011/05/15/preferences-as-objects-of-meditation/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Salinya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/?p=2860#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post. Indeed preferences can influence whether or not we give in to a certain emotion or decision, but being mindful about it will always be an opportunity to choose whether or not to acknowledge and actually act on that. I love how you can NOT pick up emotions such as anger or disappointment, simply because you see it coming before it has arrived. The realization of an emotion coming helps us avoid any regret that may come after acting hastily about that emotion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post. Indeed preferences can influence whether or not we give in to a certain emotion or decision, but being mindful about it will always be an opportunity to choose whether or not to acknowledge and actually act on that. I love how you can NOT pick up emotions such as anger or disappointment, simply because you see it coming before it has arrived. The realization of an emotion coming helps us avoid any regret that may come after acting hastily about that emotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the Sadness that Flows from Clinging to Belief by Peter Clothier</title>
		<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2011/05/22/on-the-sadness-that-flows-from-clinging-to-belief/comment-page-1/#comment-1616</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Clothier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 15:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/?p=2890#comment-1616</guid>
		<description>Well, there&#039;s always October 21st, the new date!  Seriously, though, re: beliefs...  I had some thoughts about the political ramifications of beliefs in a recent entry in my new blog, Vote Obama 2012.  They contribute, I believe, to the poisoning of the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there&#8217;s always October 21st, the new date!  Seriously, though, re: beliefs&#8230;  I had some thoughts about the political ramifications of beliefs in a recent entry in my new blog, Vote Obama 2012.  They contribute, I believe, to the poisoning of the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Judgement Day Scenario &#8211; What&#8217;s Wrong with this Picture? by Paul</title>
		<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2011/05/12/judgement-day-scenario-whats-wrong-with-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-1602</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 03:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/?p=2834#comment-1602</guid>
		<description>This is good stuff, 9999, thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good stuff, 9999, thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Judgement Day Scenario &#8211; What&#8217;s Wrong with this Picture? by 9999nath</title>
		<link>http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/2011/05/12/judgement-day-scenario-whats-wrong-with-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-1601</link>
		<dc:creator>9999nath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 03:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgerhards.com/blog_thisisthatis/?p=2834#comment-1601</guid>
		<description>Did anyone see the picture of the controversial billboard that was recently put up by another spiritual group near Family Radio’s headquarters? It directly challenges them about May 21. Here is a picture of it: 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/62779138@N08/5708063636&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/62779138@N08/5708063636&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone see the picture of the controversial billboard that was recently put up by another spiritual group near Family Radio’s headquarters? It directly challenges them about May 21. Here is a picture of it: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/62779138@N08/5708063636" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/62779138@N08/5708063636</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

